|

To the Question of Antimissile Maneuver

Authors: Arapov O.L., Zuyev Yu.S. Published: 08.02.2015
Published in issue: #1(100)/2015  
DOI: 10.18698/0236-3933-2015-1-34-46

 
Category: Aviation, Rocket and Space Engineering | Chapter: Dynamics, Ballistics, Flying Vehicle Motion Control  
Keywords: intercept, rocket-target, anti-aircraft missile complex, beaten zone, method of proportional guidance, antimissile maneuver

In work results of researches an assessment of reduction methods the probability interception of unmanned aerial vehicles for the example the PM 5B27 rocket target are presented. The modified algorithm of control the motion trajectory for overcoming of beaten zones by anti-aircraft missile complexes is offered. The authors are given results of numerical simulation of interception of rockets targets (when implementing of various trajectories of their movement) by the C-125M complex. This complex was developed in 1970 and now is removed from arms. Influence of motion parameters of rockets targets on the size of a miss for the anti-aircraft missile complex is considered. For the most objective research of these algorithms the authors examine the interception model with two C-125M complexes removed from each other. In the present article the conditional probability interception of targets was adopted as the key parameter to evaluate the algorithms efficiency of motion of these targets. This parameter is defined as the ratio of integrated time of conditional interception on trajectory to the total time of flight along it.

References

[1] Dolin V.D., Koval’chuk V.A., Martynov V.V., Seleznev I.S. Sposob umen’sheniya veroyatnosti porazheniya letatel’nogo apparata sredstvami protivovozdushnoy oborony [A method of reducing the destruction probability of the aircraft by means of air defense]. Patent RF, no. 2095737, 1997.

[2] Talanov B.P. Sposob upravleniya skorostnym vozdushnym ob’ektom v zone opasnosti porazheniya [Control method for high-speed air objects within beaten danger zone]. Patent RF, no. 2158697, 2000.

[3] Golovin A.I., Kurdin G.V., Maklashov V.A., Sadkov V.D. Sposob protivodeystviya sredstvam protivovozdushnoy oborony i ustroystvo dlya ego realizatsii [Method of counteracting means of air defense (AD) and device for its implementation]. Patent RF, no. 2226278, 2001.

[4] Shchepetil’nikov S.R., Ovchinnikov M.V. Sposob formirovaniya spiralevidnogo dvizheniya planiruyushchego letatel’nogo apparata otnositel’no opornoy traektorii [Method of forming spiral motion of gliding flying vehicle relative to reference trajectory]. Patent RF, no. 2306593, 2007.

[5] Timokhin E.L, Zharyy O.N. Rocket-target "Pishchal" is cheap, efficient and easy to operate. Voennyy parad [Military Рarade], 1998, no. 4, pp. 56-57 (in Russ.).

[6] Personal site on the history of Air Defense - Anti-Aircraft Missile "PVO-ZRK S-125 "Neva" ("Pechora") (in Russ.). Available at: http://historykpvo-2.ucoz.ru/index/zrk_s_125_quot_neva_quot_quot_pechera_quot/0-7 (accessed 18.05.2014).

[7] State Standard of the Russian Federation: GOST 20058-80. Dinamika letatel’nykh apparatov v atmosfere. Terminy, opredeleniya i oboznacheniya [Aircraft dynamics in atmosphere. Terms, definitions and symbols]. Moscow, USSR State Committee on Standards, 1981. 54 p.

[8] Kyong N.D., Tkham D.K., Tkhan’ N.D. The influence of movement parameters of an air maneuvering target on the guidance accuracy of a homing surface-to-air missile. Inform.-izm. i upravl. sistemy [Inf.-Meas. andCont. Systems], 2008, no. 9(6), pp. 60-67 (in Russ.).

[9] Arapov O.L., Zuev Yu.S. Increasing the probability of overcoming means of air defense by air vehicle. Vestn. Kontserna PVO "Almaz-Antey" [Bull. of Concern "Almaz-Antey"], 2014, no. 1(11), pp. 57-60 (in Russ.).

[10] Neupokoev F.K. Strel’ba zenitnymi raketami [Anti-aircraft missiles firing]. Moscow, Voenizdat Publ., 1980. 296 p.